Category Archives: Music

Víkingur Ólafsson @ Harpa in Iceland

For my 61st birthday – how strange it is, to write those words – my wife took me to Iceland. There is a longer account of my trip coming, with travel advice as well as “what we did”. Our main objective was to see the northern lights, and we succeeded spectacularly. A story for another post.

By happy accident, we had to move our trip up a week from my birthday, and I discovered that a pianist I love, Víkingur Ólafsson, would be playing at Harpa during our visit. And he would be playing the Goldberg Variations, one of the summits of the piano repertoire. 

Now, Harpa is a magnificent building, and in my previous two trips to Iceland, I had somehow managed not to visit it. And Víkingur Ólafsson is a world-class pianist, the Deutsche Gramaphone Artist of the Year for 2019, and he happens to be Icelandic. And I would later learn that the date of the concert, February 14th, happened to be his 40th birthday. All in all the omens were favorable. I scrambled to get tickets – the event was nearly sold out – but I succeeded in getting nosebleed seats (the second to last row of the enormous main hall). 

Harpa is a magnificent building. The lobby interior is vast and surrounded by crystalline glass structures lit with a slowly rotating color, blue being the most predominant. There is a restaurant downstairs, which we did not try (favoring Fjallkonen for dinner), and as well there is a jazz club on the top floor, which, sadly, we did not have the chance to visit. One can take the elevator or climb the stairs as we did, making our way nearly to the top, slowly, taking too many pictures as we went. 

As we wait, I listen to the crowd. They are mostly Icelandic, judging from the conversation and the clothing. But here and there, I hear a smattering of English and German, and some guests appeared to be from Asia. (I saw many more Asian tourists than I expected, in both our hotel and out and about). Finally, the doors open, and I hustle to my seat to get some shots of the concert hall before people crowd the hall.

It is a bit like being in the Imperial Senate in Star Wars. The room is dramatic, and very steep. A mild vertigo starts for me. I never had issues with vertigo until I went to the Guggenheim in New York City. Now I feel a faint discomfort when in steep, open balcony seating. But I master that and head up to the edge to take some photos. 

The room is oddly smoky, as if a rock concert is about to break out. There are neon red striped lights surrounding the stage, and a jagged orange strip light running through the floor of the stage, surely intended to evoke a lava flow. The lights changed periodically during the show, very unusual for classical performances. 

Soon it’s time, and a tall, trim, bespectacled man takes the stage. He is dapper, wearing a modern-cut, medium-blue suit. He looks like an earnest graduate student, not one of the most brilliant pianists in the world.

The Theme and Variations is one of the canonical forms of classical music. A theme is played, then developed in repeated in variations, usually alternating between fast and slow, happy and sad. The Goldberg Variations are one of the most difficult and beautiful pieces of the piano repertoire, consisting of a theme and 30 variations. Perhaps the best-known recordings are by Glenn Gould, who famously recorded the piece twice, once as a young man and once not that long before he died. 

The theme opens with a crystalline singing, with simple lines and chords. Writing descriptively about a musical performance is always difficult, but let me start by simply saying that Ólafsson’s performance was astounding. His rendering of the Goldberg was over 75 minutes in duration. He of course played this without any breaks and without any score to guide him, it was all from memory. I do not believe that during that entire performance, I heard anything like a mistake. His tone was absolutely beautiful, and even during the most frenetic parts of the piece, his sound had total clarity. Every note was audible, even when buried inside a chord. Every phrase had total conviction and a deeply felt intent. Glenn Gould was famous for bringing out the “inside lines”, the melodies lurking in the lower registers and not the highest pitch. Ólafsson has a similar ability. Even my wife, who knows classical music but doesn’t listen to it much, remarked on that aspect of his playing. 

I recently had a chance to hear Helene Grimaud in Boston. She is also a world-famous pianist and justifiably so. But I must say that Olaffson’s playing affected me more deeply and had much greater tonal clarity and precision. And I enjoyed her concert very much – I am not attempting to denigrate her playing at all, simply to give some perspective on how elevated this particular performance felt to me. Even at his fastest playing, it seemed clear that Ólafsson had another gear we did not hear.

I saw John Williams, the guitarist, some time ago in Boston. My friend Lynn remarked that during a particularly difficult passage, Williams seemed to have grown an extra finger. During one of the most frenetic variations, I thought Ólafsson had grown an extra hand. It just did not seem possible, what I was hearing.

Visually, he was intriguing to watch. He did not have as many quirky mannerisms as some pianists do, but he did perform the occasional self-conducting (ala Glenn Gould) when he was playing a single, slow-paced melody. Occasionally, during meditative sections, his head would sink, nearly touching the keyboard. Ólafsson’s technique was impeccable and visually interesting. Of particular note was his constant hand-crossing, playing blistering scales at a frenetic pace, where his left hand played rising scales while the right hand crossed over to play a melody below, both in pitch and on the keyboard.

The auditorium acoustics were wonderful. We heard complete clarity, even in the next-to-last row. With the lights down, it was almost like a meditation session, as the music surrounded us for almost 80 minutes in a long continuous stream. I confess, I almost nodded off once, but in a good way :()

Variation 29’s frenetic pace and associated technique faded to Variation 30’s stately, quiet chorale-like structure, then to the reprise of the quiet, calm opening theme. The room was silent for a good 20-30 seconds – whether in appreciation, in unsureness of whether he was done, or just a desire not to break the spell, I cannot say. The last reason for me.

Then cheers and bravos broke out. The hometown crowd brought him back for bows four times. After the last, he spoke for a few moments in Icelandic. There was frequent laughter from the crowd. Very much a hometown crowd. Then he left, and the lights came up. The show was over. The usual bring-back-the-artist-to-play encores was not to be.

I asked my concert neighbors to my left, clearly Icelandic, what he had said. For a change, one of the two, the man, seemed uncomfortable answering in English (most Icelanders I have attempted conversation with have impeccable English). The woman said, “He said something like, after this, there can be no encore.” Her translation was imprecise, but I certainly took her to mean not that he was tired, but rather that he held the piece in such high regard he did not wish to break the spell of it. We had no complaints.

If you are interested in any of this, you can listen to Ólafsson’s recording of the Goldberg Variations on Spotify. 

J.S. Bach: Goldberg Variations

Listen to J.S. Bach: Goldberg Variations on Spotify. Johann Sebastian Bach · Album · 2023 · 32 songs.

He has also written in-depth thoughts on the piece, which you can read here: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2023/oct/06/vikingur-olafsson-pianist-on-bach-goldberg-variations

In case my review sounds over-enthusiastic, here are two others, including his recent Carnegie Hall performance.

Víkingur Ólafsson sets new gold standard in Bach’s Variations

United Kingdom Bach: Víkingur Ólafsson (piano). Royal Festival Hall, London, 22.9.2023. (CSa) JS Bach – Goldberg Variations, BWV.988 It is said that Bach’s insomniac patron, Count Keyserling, in need of musical entertainment to help him pass his sleepless nights, commissioned some clavier pieces from the composer to be played by the court’s resident harpsichordist Johann Gottlieb Goldberg.

Review: Vikingur Olafsson’s ‘Goldbergs’ Mesmerize Carnegie Hall

In his debut on the main Carnegie stage, Olafsson gave a spectacular reading of Bach’s “Goldberg” Variations.

Lastly, there is an excellent interview between Ólafsson and the Glenn Gould Foundation to be found here.

A happy accident indeed!

Hélène Grimaud @ Jordan Hall

When I saw the program, I knew I had to go. Back in Boston for a spell, with access to world class musicians again! Beethoven, Brahms, and Bach. The Beethoven and Brahms pieces are pieces I know and love and listen to often. The Bach is the Chaconne in D Minor, a majestic work for violin, which I know mostly from the often-performed classical guitar arrangement. Grimaud is performing a piano arrangement by Busoni, which I did not know existed!

I was last at Jordan Hall for John Williams, I think, perhaps in the 1990s. I attended with Michelle and our good friends Thomas and Lynn. I still remember Williams’s performance of Domeniconi’s Koyunbaba, in which Lynn decided Williams had grown a sixth finger during the performance, or else he would not have been able to do what he did…

It was not that long ago, that we could not see live music performed. I am grateful that we can again do so!

Jordan Hall a beautiful and comfortable hall with excellent acoustics.

Ms. Grimaud took the stage, and took a few bars to find her footing on the Beethoven. I listen to the Gould version quite often. Grimaud’s take is clean and professional, if somewhat dry in comparison. Her tempi are slower than Gould’s, but then, most everyone’s is. Gould’s insistence that the only reason to record something is to make it new and fresh leads him to interesting, idiosyncratic interpretations (and humming, lots of humming).

Ms. Grimaud’s Beethoven was crisp and enjoyable, if missing the occasional ecstatic bursts that Gould renders so well. Hearing the music live gave the pieces a freshness I have been missing from listening to recordings. Still, her tempo variations occasionally jarred me out of my listening. I heard what I thought were a few minor mistakes or simply a muddled sound – passages that did not seem quite right for pieces I know quite well. Nevertheless, it was riveting to listen and watch – it’s been some time since I went to a live classical music performance.

The first half concluded with the Brahms Three Intermezzi, Op. 117, another set of pieces I have long admired. Her Brahms was surer than her Beethoven to my ears.

After a brief intermission – what Jordan hall, nobody selling wine during intermission? – I have been away from concerts too long, and I missed having a glass on break.

Back at it after intermission, Grimaud played like she had dinner reservations. I mean this not in a negative way particularly, but she launched into Brahms’ Seven Fantasies, Op. 116 before her welcome applause had even stopped. I love these pieces – moody, introspective, lyrical, and Grimaud’s performance did them justice. But with just a micro-second of pause, she leapt from the Brahms into an explosive rendering of the Bach Chaconne.

The Chaconne is a majestic work, in the canon of both the violin and the guitar. Segovia transcribed the piece for the guitar in the 1930s, cementing the instrument’s place as a serious classical instrument. Famously, he had this to say about it:

Segovia had a story he would tell whenever he talked about the Chaconne. According to Segovia, the famous violinist Enesco gave the following advice to a student: “You must study the Chaconne all your life, but you must not play it in public until you are 50, because it is very, very deep.”

https://www.guitarist.com/the-chaconne/

Since we are talking Brahms here, I learned after the concert that Brahms himself wrote a transcription of the Chaconne for the piano for one hand – the left.(listen here) Here is what Brahms had to say about this piece:

The Chaconne is, in my opinion, one of the most wonderful and most incomprehensible pieces of music. Using the technique adapted to a small instrument, the man writes a whole world of the deepest thoughts and most powerful feelings. If I could picture myself writing, or even conceiving, such a piece, I am certain that the extreme excitement and emotional tension would have driven me mad. If one has no supremely great violinist at hand, the most exquisite of joys is probably simply to let the Chaconne ring in one’s mind. But the piece certainly inspires one to occupy oneself with it somehow…. There is only one way in which I can secure undiluted joy from the piece, though on a small and only approximate scale, and that is when I play it with the left hand alone…. The same difficulty, the nature of the technique, the rendering of the arpeggios, everything conspires to make me feel like a violinist!

The Busoni arrangement is, on the other hand, majestic, titanic, explosive, and wonderful to listen to, providing a fundamentally different view of this piece, which in the original violin has a more quiet majesty. This was like listening to Listz or Tchaikowsky – brilliant cadenzas, thundering chords, and a general explosion of sound.

The applause for Grimaud’s Chaconne was thunderous, and she came back for two encores, which I did not recognize. Grimaud did not speak, ever, even to introduce her encores. I’m out of date on current concert practices but I was surprised.

Then I was out into the freezing, snowy night and into a Lyft for home, which made getting out of Boston quick and painless.

The program was a bit short, I thought. 90 minutes, with an intermission. Compare that to a recent Andras Schiff performance in Boston, clocking in at 150 minutes.

But all in all, a lovely evening with wonderful performances. Occasionally erratic or not entirely convincing, but lovely nonetheless. Here is a playlist of her recordings of the pieces in her program.


Other reviews, less positive than mine, from professional reviewers, (who of course have to have something to write about) here and here. There I learn that her two encores were Rachmaninov’s Etude-Tableau In C Major Op. 33 No. 2 and Valentin Silvestrov’s Bagatelle #2.

Can you hear me now?

Sugai Ken in “concert”

So, I’m working on my nearly-finished first release of my book tracking app, TBR

Did I mention I had shoulder surgery back in January? I’ve been doing rehab exercises every day, three times a day, since January. It’s become something of a habit. But I keep reminders, because otherwise I get caught up in things and forget. I started with the simple iPhone todo list app, but awhile back I switched to the Not Boring Software’s Habits app. A game-like experience for forming habits, or as the founder Andy puts it, the World’s Most Satisfying Checkbox. And it kinda is…. animations, 3D models, and sounds. And it’s pretty. Just won one of Apple’s App Design Awards. 

Face-palm. My app has no sound! (for that matter, neither does my existing app Bookship). Duh. 

I’ve never done it before, so I start reading. In my head, my app is making bookish noises like a page turning, etc. As I read I learn that audio UX has similar design styles to visual design, and “Skeuomorphism” (things sound like / look like what they are), may not be the best approach for sound ux. And more importantly that sound design is another path to creating a compelling brand.

Just as there is a place for visual designers, who can create something beautiful and connective, the same is true for audio. There are firms that do nothing else, for example. 

OK well I’m not ready to belly up to the bar and hire a composer, and my needs are pretty modest. So, I go digging for sound effects. Well. There’s a lot of them, and a lot of places to look. I poke around a bunch of sites (Freesound, SoundSnap, Mixkit, Artlist.io etc), talk to my son-in-law game developer, who recommends Pond5 and reminds me to make sure I get licenses for everything. “Free is free, but sometimes it’s worth paying”. 

I poke around and prototype with 5 or so free sounds from different sources but realize they don’t hang together – individually good, but all different and kind of random, and the possibilities are overwhelming. I realize I need to take a step back and think about what I want.

What is this sound for? What am I trying to convey? What is my brand about? And then look for a package (a sound pack) of thematically consistent sounds.

Well, to me, books are about learning, and being transported; a means of adventure, and a place of peace and escape from all the noise out there. Youtube, Instagram, TikTok, Netflix, your job, etc. ad nauseam. I want something tranquil, restful, non-invasive, almost kind of Zen. Yeah, that’s it. Zen. I start building a soundboard, googling and listening, of some concepts that have the feel I might want.

Turns out Not Boring’s Habits used a composer named Thomas Williams. Mostly games, but some utility apps and even some short films. Here’s a soundtrack he made for a game, it’s actually nice to just listen to.

Nice. Since I’m thinking Zen, I start googling for Zen sound effects, and stumble upon Ableton, which is audio editing software, and reading their blog. I find this article. Mentions a Japanese composer, Sugai Ken, who does field recordings and integrates nature sounds into his music.

Yeah. A lot of natural sounds, pings and echos, things that could be at home in a quiet app about books. I take that as a vector and run with it.

After about a million listens to random chirps and squeaks and pings (my wife says, “What the hell are you doing over there?” :)), I stumble on a few things that feel promising. 

After letting it sit for a day, seeing how the sounds feel after a lot of listens, and prototyping a bit, I feel like this one is the answer: Sound Ex Machina’s UI Sounds Musical. I found it on Artlist.io, when I go to buy it it looks like it’s $10 a month to subscribe. Fine. Go to subscribe, realize no, I need the premium version @ $15/month to get the rights. OK fine. Go again to purchase, get something that says, “Oh you want SFX?” That’s $20/month. Just enough annoyance and friction in the process to make me go looking elsewhere. I try to find their real website and see if I can buy it, it says “Down for Maintenance”. A few days later it still is. I wonder if they’ve gone under…anyway in the meantime I find a direct purchase on itch.io. Even better, the Artlist package only has ~30 sounds, but this “real” package has 300, and for about the same money. I go for it. At which point I learn that the sounds I bookmarked on Artlist have Artlist-specific names, so I have to go match up the ones I’ve chosen against the 300. No big deal, just realize, if you like a package of sounds, look for the original if you can – more sounds, better pricing, etc. 

The other bit of advice all the blogs give is, don’t do too much; it gets overwhelming or irritating pretty quickly. I try to restrain myself to key actions and errors. 

Anyway, after that it’s all downhill. Just integrating the code (I’m on Ionic, there’s a simple plugin for playing audio, which I use, and it’s all integrated in under a day). Oh. Don’t forget haptics too – vibrations, the “feel” of the app. I do that too. I don’t know if people will like all this or not, but the app just feels and sounds so much more real, more tactile, more professional. 

Fingers crossed :). 

Here’s a short sample of the sounds I’ve ended up using:

I hope you get a chance to check out the app, and our sounds. (Oh: bonus: the first sound you hear is a Ukelele, the native instrument of Hawaii where I live. Not a factor in my decision, just a happy accident.

Some background reading I found helpful as I was working on sounds:

And some sound resources, places to look for interesting sounds:

https://www.pond5.com
https://freesound.org/
https://www.soundsnap.com/
https://mixkit.co/free-sound-effects/
https://www.storyblocks.com/audio/sound-effects
https://www.artlist.io

Neil Peart, RIP

LOS ANGELES, CA – MAY 06: Musician Neil Peart of the band Rush performs at the Nokia Theatre on May 6, 2008 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Jesse Grant/Getty Images)

Neil Peart died a few days ago. He was the drummer and lyricist for the band Rush (in case you didn’t know). It’s affected me more than I expected, and more than most any death I can remember that was not someone I knew personally. From my high school years on, I’ve drawn inspiration from their music, and how they lived their lives. I’ve just finished a complete listen of every studio album they did (no, not maudlin at all :)), and it’s an amazing body of work. Having trouble shaking the sadness so I thought I’d write a quick post and maybe get some of it it out of my system.

I grew up on Rush. From the youthful energy and ideas of 2112, and the libertarian poetry of The Trees, to the more nuanced, middle-aged days of Vapor Trails and Snakes & Arrows, Rush was different. While other rock bands were singing about sex, drugs and rock & roll, Rush was singing about ideas, things that matter – dreams, inspiration, loneliness & alienation, the Holocaust, the atom bomb, aging (Losing It, Time Stand Still), fear and not giving in to it, and chasing experience, religion, chance and fate (Between the Wheels, Free Will, Roll the Bones, You Bet Your Life), drive & the costs of chasing your dreams, doggedness (We Hold On, Something for Nothing), the dark side of fame, the mob and fear, car racing in the future when cars are outlawed, suicide (The Pass), Samuel Taylor Coleridge poems, a near symphonic rock rendition of a metaphorical / cultural battle between Apollo and Dionysus (I’m not making this up).

OK there were some trips through black holes and encounters with priests from the future, and for God’s sake a song about baldness too.

Anyway they were different. And inspiring. Whenever I get down or feeling like I’m not making progress, there’s a Rush song to get me moving again. Neil was fond of quoting Bob Dylan:

“The highest purpose of art is to inspire. What else can you do for anyone but inspire them?”

Well done, Neil.

And the older I get, the more I appreciate artists who continue to innovate as they age, raise their game, do not give in to the dying of the light (Robert Plant comes to mind as well). These guys were (and are) the musicians’s musicians – complete virtuosos, and ever so humble. And at the heart of their music was Neil – the lyricist and the driving beat.

You can read elsewhere about Neil’s life, but he suffered unimaginable personal tragedy, but managed to claw himself back to life, and to continue performing and creating, and finding a new personal life. That he died of brain cancer at 67 just isn’t fair. But he knew, and wrote often, about how life isn’t fair.

Not to be morbid, but none of us know how long we have.

One of Neil’s mantras was, “What is the most excellent thing I can do today?”.

Find someone and something you care about, and commit yourself to them. Say no to the things that don’t matter. There’s not a moment to waste.

Oh. The master at work: